| News : World News : 'Da Vinci Code' dispute returns to court |
|
|
|   | ||||
'Da Vinci Code' dispute returns to court
Tuesday, 16-Jan-2007 02:31PM EDT
Story from United Press International. Copyright 2007 by United Press International (via ClariNet) LONDON, Jan. 16 (UPI) -- The legal battle between Dan Brown, author of "The Da Vinci Code," and two authors claiming breach of copyright re-ignited in a British court Tuesday. In the hearing, attorneys for British authors Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh said a lower court's adverse ruling was "based on a misunderstanding of the law and of the claim," The Times of London said. The men claimed Brown stole the central theme from their book, "The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail," for his thriller. A lower court ruling cleared Brown of the charge. Jonathan Rayner James told the three-judge panel his clients' original claim -- "that the theme appropriated by Brown and used in 'The Da Vinci Code' was a substantial part of (their) copyright" -- was still valid. In clearing Brown, the lower court ruled Baigent and Leigh should pay 85 percent of Random House court costs, which were estimated at nearly $2.5 million, as well as their own legal fees. Random House was the publisher of both books. "The Da Vinci Code" explores the theory that Jesus and Mary Magdalene were married and had a child, and that the bloodline continued through the centuries. Add to: Tags Related to 'Da Vinci Code' dispute returns to court |
|
|||
| Home | About Us | Affiliate Program | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Resources |
| popularq.net is an independent survey program and is not affiliated with any of the listed products or retailers. popularq.net programs are provided for entertainment purposes only. The survey results are not scientific and reflects th e opinions of only those Internet users who have chosen to participate. The results cannot be assumed to represent the opinions of I nternet users in general, nor the public as a whole. Trademarks, service marks, logos, and/or domain names (including, without limit ation, the individual names of products and retailers) are the property of their respective owners, who have no association with or make any endorsement of the products or services provided by popularq.net. popularq.net does not provide any free products. popularq .com does not keep any personal identifiable information. Make sure to check the terms of conditions and privacy statements of all a dvertisers. popularq.net is not responsible for advertisers content or functionality of advertiser sites. |